Multiple Streams Framework as Scientific Research Program and Tool for the Analysis of Public Policy Issues

Abstract The Multiple Streams Framework (MSF) is currently one of the most widely used frameworks in policy process research. It explains how agenda develops with emphasis on adoption. This article examines MSF from perspective history science and Lakatos’ methodology scientific research programs. In this respect, we consider a “semi-strong theory” that uses form subsumption under theory for explanation. differs “strong” explanatory (e.g., physics), which explanations law. From point view methodology, represents program. basic element hard core given mainly by hypothesis framework as whole assumptions key structural elements. Around there protective belt auxiliary hypotheses. They correspond to hypotheses related framework’s elements whole. has negative heuristics (prohibition use modus tollens rule) positive heuristics, are represented set theoretically empirically progressive theories further develop An analysis studies reveals single only exceptionally tested using “hard” data quantitative methods. Qualitative (case studies) predominates, contributes development theory. Therefore, can shift be considered successful However, terms programs, number other opportunities testing various modelling methods sets. Thus, an interesting program, needs developed specified spirit challenge interdisciplinary field social sciences.